Basically, there are 3 major topics under this
chapter.
The four maxims/corollaries in the principle of cooperation.
The other three principle of verbal messages which are meanings vary in politeness, messages vary in assertiveness and messages can be deceive were discussed in the previous post.
1.
Principle of Verbal Messages
There are 6 principles of verbal
messages.
* Meanings are in people
* Language is
denotative an connotative
* Meanings depends
on context
* Meanings vary in
politeness
* Messages vary in
assertiveness
* Messages can be
deceive
A) Meanings are in people
We have to understand that the meanings of the message
are in people, but not in words. As you changed, the meanings you created out
of past message may be changed. Means that, although the message doesn’t
change, the meaning you created yesterday and today may not be the same.
Bypassing occurs when the sender and the receiver miss
each other with their meanings.
Different words, same meaning
|
It might look like there is disagreement on the surface
but there is agreement at the level of meaning.
|
Same words, different meaning
|
It might look like both agree each other just because
they use the same words but at the level of meaning, they are not really
agree that (both are unconscious of the misunderstood).
|
B) Language is denotative and connotative.
Denotative is the meaning you found in a dictionary,
while connotative is the emotional meaning of the words that given by the
speaker.
For example, the word ‘fat’, for boys, it might mean
weight gained; but for girls, when she was told that she is fat, she might
think that she look uglier than before and might feeling depressed.
Snarl words and purr words are used to clarify the
difference between denotative and connotative.
Snarl words are highly negative. E.g.: She is truly shit.
They are a group of pigs. Purr words are highly positive. E.g.: She looks like
an angle. He is my dream.
C) Meanings depend on context.
Cultural context
Cultural context
1.The Principle of
Cooperation
|
Meaning to say, both parties try to let each other understand each
other in a communication.
|
The four maxims/corollaries in the principle of cooperation.
The maxim of quality |
Say what you know only.
|
The maxim of relations |
Talk about something relevant to the conversation only.
|
The maxim of manner |
Be clear and avoid ambiguities.
|
The maxim of quantity
|
Be informative in the conversation.
|
2.The Principle of
Peaceful relation
|
Maintain peaceful relationships and
not to insult others in the conversation.
|
3.The Principle of Denigration
|
Avoid taking credit
for accomplishment, or raising your own
image.
|
The Gender Context
Men tend to be direct and sometimes to the point of rude,
while women tend to be indirect and more complicated.
Example of gender context
|
Men: Have these letters out by
three.
|
Women: It would be great if the
letters could go out today.
|
The other three principle of verbal messages which are meanings vary in politeness, messages vary in assertiveness and messages can be deceive were discussed in the previous post.
2.Disconfirmation and Confirmation
Disconfirmation is a communication pattern in which
we ignore a person’s presence and their message. Most people tend to think that
a person is rejecting them although the fact is that the person is only
disconforming them. We should bear in mind that disconfirmation and rejection
are two different matters.
When we reject someone, we only disagree with them
on something. We are just unwilling to accept the persons’ actions or words. On
the other hand, disconfirming someone is the act of denying that persons’
importance. We kind of neglect what they are saying are doing as to us it
simply does not matter. In disconfirmation, the person would feel like they do
not exist and in rejection, one would feel like they had done something wrong.
Confirmation is the act of acknowledging someones
presence and importance. It also involves our acceptance towards that
particular person.
Now, take a look at this scene which also includes
the examples of disconfirmation, rejection and confirmation responses.
You just
received this semester’s results and they are a lot better than previous
semesters’ results but they are still not great. You tell your parents, “I
really tried hard to get an excellent result for this semester.”
Here are your
parents’ responses in three different manners.
Disconfirmation: What should we have for
dinner?
Confirmation: Going out every night
hardly seems like trying very hard.
Rejection: Keep up the good work.
In disconfirmation, there are 4 major offensive language
practices.
The first offensive language practice is RACISM. We are racist when we make a particular
race look inferior to another by using any language through conscious or
unconscious attempt. This could happen everywhere and anywhere. Racist language
expresses our racist attitudes. For example, it is consider rude to call an
Indian person Keling and to African American it is rude to call them blacks or
Nigger.
Source: Facebook |
There are certain guidelines we should follow to avoid racist remarks.
Firstly, we should avoid disconfirming or confirming to statements or message
because of a persons’ skin color. We should not insult or attribute others
according to their race or cultural beliefs too. Lastly, we should not
generalize and connect extremist attacks.
Next, SEXISM
is a prejudicial attitude and beliefs with support favoritism that criticizes
about a specific gender. It is also known as having a bias towards a specific
gender. In sexism, there is sexist language regarded as a language that puts
down a person due to his or her gender. In this practice, it is common for
people to have sex-role stereotyping which is the assumption that certain roles
or professions belong to men and others belong to women. For example, women
should take up the profession of a police officer and men should not take over
the role of women as housewives. In today’s society, we should take precaution
to avoid sexist remarks. How can we do so? Here are some ways to avoid sexist
remarks:
v Avoid disconfirming or conforming to
statements or messages because of their gender.
v Do not insult or attribute others
according to gender bias.
There is also HETEROSEXISM that involves
attitudes, behaviors and language used to disparage gays and lesbians.
Heterosexism is also a language presumes all people are heterosexual. People in
the society should not shun those who are homosexual but learn to accept and
understand them instead. We should avoid using heterosexist language. We should
avoid offensive nonverbal mannerisms that parody stereotypes, avoid
“complimenting” gay men and lesbians on their heterosexual appearance and avoid
assuming and individual gay person can speak for all gay people.
convey-yourself.blogspot |
Lastly, there is AGEISM whereby
it is a prejudice against a person of other age groups. This form of discrimination
is usually against the old and aging people. For example, a company would want
to hire young graduates instead of mid-age men or women who are about to reach
the age of retirement. We should avoid putting off someone because she or he is
older, be patient with older folks as some of them might just have a problem
with listening, do not assume older people are not interested in relationships
and finally yet importantly do not assume older people are not interested in
the world around them.
To
wrap up the points above, racism, sexism, heterosexism and ageism are the major
offensive language practices that we should not make it as a habit. Accept
others for who they are.
In order to reduce our discrimination
towards others, we should learn more on the preferred terms used in talking to
and about members of different cultures. We learn to use language that is free
of sexism, heterosexism, racism or ageism. This is cultural identifier. There
are three forms of cultural identifiers.
1. Race and
nationality
Do not label people with names that they
dislike based on their skin, colors, or traits. We should be sensitive to
everyone’s culture. For instance, we should know that it is inappropriate to
repute Asians as Orientals as this term
regards European culture as preeminent.
2. Affectional orientation
Do not use the
word gay and lesbian in situations like, “I didn’t that someone who is
gay/lesbian would be able to do that.” Why is it so? This is because the word
gay and lesbian technically refers to a persons’ lifestyle, not their sexual
orientation.
3. Age and sex
It is impolite for us to call an older person
who is above 65 years old as old people. The word old person is rather
offensive, so we should regard them as senior citizens. We should also call
females and males below 17 years old as young female or girl and young males or
boy. For those above 17 years old we should regard them as man and woman. Bear
in mind that we should avoid using the word lady too as it is actually a type
of stereotype of a proper woman.
For this second major topic on
disconfirmation and confirmation, Mr. Anwari had showed us a video on racism.
Below is the video. Enjoy J
3.Using Verbal Messages Effectively
The term intensional
orientation (the “s” is intentional) refers to the tendency to view people,
objects, and events in terms of how they are talked about or the way they are
labeled. While extensional orientation refers to a tendency to look first at
the actual people, objects, and events before looking at the labels.
For example,
intensional orientation occurs when you think of a professor as an unworldly
egghead, as that is your generalized image of a professor before getting to
know the specific professor. In contrast, extensional orientation means you
look at the professor without any preconceived labels, but guided by what he
does or says, not judging him by the labels.
The right way to correct intensional
orientation is to focus first on the object, person, or event and then on the
way in which the object, person, or event is talked about. Do not allow the
labels to obscure what they meant to symbolize although labels can be helpful
guides. Besides that, we have to avoid allness. The world is infinitely
complex, and because of this you can never say all there is to say about
anything—at least not logically. You may think you know all there is to know
about certain individuals or about why they did what they did, yet clearly, you
don’t know all.
For
instance, you go on a first date with someone, just because of the boredom in
the first hour during the first date, you may infer that this person is dull,
always and everywhere. Yet it could be that this person is simply ill at ease
or shy during first meetings. The problem here is that you are judging a person
based on a very short acquaintanceship. Further, if you then define this person
as dull, you are likely to treat the person as dull and fulfill your own
prophecy.
A useful extensional device that can help you
avoid allness is to end each statement, sometimes verbally but always mentally,
with an “etc.” (Et cetera)—a reminder that there is more to learn, know, and
say; every stat to be sure, some people overuse the “et cetera.” They use it as
a substitute for being specific, which defeats its purpose. Instead, it should
be used to mentally remind yourself that there is more to know and more to say.
Everything is unique. Language, however, provides similar nouns, such as
teacher, student, friend, enemy, war, politician and liberal. Such nouns can
lead you to group together all teachers, all students, and all friends and
divert attention from the uniqueness of each individual, object, and event.
The
misevaluation known as indiscrimination, a form of stereotyping, it occurs when
you focus on classes of individuals, objects, or events and fail to see that
each is unique. Indiscrimination can be seen in such statements, " He’s
just like the rest of them: lazy, stupid, a real slob." "Read a
detective novel? I read one when I was 16. That was enough to convince
me." Index is an extensional device that is antidote to indiscrimination, a
mental subscript that identifies each individual in a group as an individual
even though all members of the group may be covered by the same label. For
example, when you think of an individual politician as just a “politician,” you
fail to see the difference between this particular politician and other
politicians. However, when you think with the index—when you think not of
politician but of politician 1 or
politician 2 or politician 3—you’re less likely to fall into the trap of indiscrimination and more
easy to differentiate the politicians.
Polarization,
referred as the fallacy of “either/or,” is the tendency to look at the world
and to describe it in terms of extremes—good or bad, positive or negative,
healthy or sick, brilliant or stupid, rich or poor, and so on. Polarized
statements come in many forms; for example: < After listening to the
evidence, I’m still not clear who is right or who is wrong? < Well, are you
for us or against us?
Most people
and events exist somewhere between the extremes of good or bad, hardworking or
lazy, pretty or ugly and so forth. Yet there seems to be a strong tendency to
view only the extremes and to categorize people, objects, and events in terms
of these polar opposites. When you use this either/or form in situations in
which is
inappropriate; for example, “The supervisor is either for us or
against us.”
The two
choices do not simply include all possibilities: The supervisor may be for us
in some things and against us in others, or he or she may be neutral. Anything
could be. Static evaluation is the tendency to retain evaluation without change
while the reality is changing. The mental date helps to keep your language and
thinking up to date and guard you against static evaluation. For example, you
have to bear in mind that the people you know in 2010 are different with 2012,
as time goes by, they will change
That is all on
chapter 5….
No comments:
Post a Comment